A moderated collaborative forum for Canadian Reformed (and other) students and academics to engage issues of Christianity and culture. Note: Please see our introductory post if you're new here. The editors of Reformed Academic are not responsible for the opinions expressed by contributors.
Inactive (archive only) since 2017.
Pages
Thursday, March 8, 2012
The Philosophical Foundations of Bavinck and Dooyeweerd
Here is a link to Echeverria’s review essay in Journal of Markets & Morality v. 14, n. 2 (Fall 2011), pp. 463–483.
For those interested, subscription information to this journal is provided here.
A subscription is necessary to access the two most recent issues online (there is an affordably priced electronic-only option for individuals), but the rest of the journal’s issues are freely available in their online archive.
2 comments:
NEW COMMENTING REQUIREMENTS
Before commenting, please view this video; it contains important points about electronic communication.
Comments are welcome, but you must (A) truly interact with the materials, demonstrating that you have considered the actual arguments and that you are advancing the discussion with your contribution; (B) include your real first & last name as well as your city and province; (C) present it in a Christian manner; (D) send us an E-mail so we can contact you (required each time you submit a comment). Automatic rejection may occur if these four criteria are not met, although we may attempt to contact you for a resubmission.
Furthermore, we reserve the right to reject comments which we deem unconstructive or inflammatory, or which simply cite “authorities” or present passages for consideration without contextualization.
Approved comments will usually appear within 72 hours. No blog contributor or commentator is obliged to respond to questions.
Please note NEW COMMENTING REQUIREMENTS above.
Your readers may be interested in an earlier exchange involving Echeverria. Over a decade ago, he expressed criticisms of Dooyeweerd in “Fides et Ratio”, Philosophia Reformata v. 65, n. 1 (2000), pp. 72-104; Roy Clouser published his reply as “Reason and Belief in God”, Philosophia Reformata v. 68, n. 1 (2003), pp. 36-68.
ReplyDeleteGregory Baus
Beijing, China
I'm grateful to Gregory Baus for informing your readers of an article I wrote on John Paul II's 1998 encyclical letter, Fides et Ratio, in which I did express criticisms of Dooyeweerd's position on faith and reason. Yes, Roy Clouser did respond some time later to my article, but I, in turn, responded to him in a subsequent article, "Once Again, John Paul II's Fides et Ratio," Philosophia Reformata v. 69 (2004), pp. 38–52. I deal more extensively with the neo-Calvinist tradition of philosophy and theology (Bavinck, Berkouwer and Dooyeweerd) in my book, Dialogue of Love: Confessions of an Evangelical Catholic Ecumenist (Wipf & Stock, 2010).
ReplyDeleteEduardo Echeverria
Detroit, MI